Ryzen 5 1600af。 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

Ryzen “AF”: AMD Releasing Ryzen 5 1600 CPUs Manufactured under 12 Nm “Zen+” Process

CPU Cores and Base Frequency Frequency: 3. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene. All tests are conducted multiple times for parity and then averaged, with outliers closely and manually inspected. This is also interesting because it indicates AMD is still making some of these parts, and may have still been making 14nm R5 1600 parts. The AMD R5 1600 AF is a brand new CPU with an old, old name from 2017. 7 seconds to complete each of the AI player turns, on average, with the overclock to 4. Wrap Up: Incredible Budget CPU That was our quick look at how the Ryzen 5 1600 AF performs and the results were as positive as we expected. 0 PCIe lanes: 20 Encryption AES-NI: Yes Thermal Management TDP PL1 : 65 W TDP PL2 : -- TDP up: -- TDP down: -- Tjunction max. Conclusion The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF is a good processor. The all-core boost algorithm may also perform better within certain applications, such as Cinebench. The R5 1600 retest data places it roughly the same as the original data, although slightly improved in average framerate. 40 GHz Hyperthreading: Yes Overclocking: Yes Core architecture: normal A core: 0x B core: 0x Internal Graphics GPU name: GPU frequency: GPU Turbo : No turbo Generation: DirectX Version: Execution units: Shader: Max. As for the R5 1600 AF, stock performance exceeded the R5 1600 AE retest results by 9. For testing we're using the with 16GB of G. Seems counterproductive, but the reason you should care is price. Intel Core i5-9400F on• Cinebench R15 used for internal validation. Error margins are also defined in our chart bars to help illustrate the limitations of statistical relevance when analyzing result differences. The number of times tested depends on the application and its completion time. Any product that has significant excursions from the mean deviation will be highlighted in its respective review. GNU Compiler Collection GCC version 7. Editorial, Host: Steve Burke Testing: Patrick Lathan Video: Keegan Gallick, Andrew Coleman Steve started GamersNexus back when it was just a cool name, and now it's grown into an expansive website with an overwhelming amount of features. We are beginning to spend more effort publicly documenting the exact versions of our tests, hoping that this is helpful to those reading our tests. Better Than The Ryzen 5 1600 AE? Tags. We see identical gaming performance from the 1600 AF when compared to the 2600 once again, this time when testing with The Division 2. CPU Test Methodology Our CPU testing methodology is split into two types of benchmarks: Games and workstation workloads, but every CPU which is sufficiently high-end will go through both sets of tests. The R5 1600 AF ends up about 6. 2GHz R5 2600 OC placed at 126FPS AVG, putting it about equal to the R5 1600 AF OC results and within test variance. First, looking at an all-core workload from Blender and the GN Logo render, we monitored the AMD R5 1600 AF CPU AVG all-core frequency at 3674MHz flat. AMD told us that the new Ryzen 5 1600 AF is a 2nd-gen replacement for the 1st-gen part, as AMD no longer has inventory of its 14nm wafer supply, and so has shifted it instead to the newer 12nm supply that it still has. Overclocking the R5 1600 AF got it to 102FPS AVG at 4. 4 GHz, the new AF model maintained 3. This would be great for a budget gaming PC. Hitman 2 Dx12 - 1080p Hitman 2 with DirectX 12 is first, starting at 1080p. After one more year, we got the current generation Zen 2 processors. 2GHz did 98FPS AVG, while the 3. Any stand-out results are reported back to the test technician and rerun after investigation. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF on• It's a 6-core, 12-thread part clocked at 3. Unit of measurement: Average score higher is better• 9GHz 1600 got stuck at 94FPS AVG. The 1600 AF matched the 2600 with identical performance in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, making it a few frames faster than the original model and we see basically identical margins at 1440p. Unit of measurement: Render time in minutes lower is better. Unit of measurement: Render time in AME lower is better. For single core performance the 2600 was 1. He recalls his first difficult decision with GN's direction: "I didn't know whether or not I wanted 'Gamers' to have a possessive apostrophe -- I mean, grammatically it should, but I didn't like it in the name. ASUS Maximus XI Hero Z390• The margins are reduced slightly at 1440p, but overall a similar story. We see no meaningful change here since the benchmark is primarily CPU-limited, not GPU-limited, and so performance is largely unaffected. The R5 2600 ran at around 86FPS AVG, putting it about equal to or slightly better than the 1600 AF. The AMD R5 1600 stock CPU moved from 199FPS AVG to 205FPS AVG after the retests, with lows also improving slightly. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time s required for the entire scene. It made sense to just leave it as 'Gamers. F1 2018 - 1080p F1 2018 is next and gives us a DirectX 11 look at games. The AMD R5 1600 stock CPU, after retesting, required about 43. Power consumption is inline with the 2600, with a slight advantage out of the box due to the minor decrease in clock speed, though this can vary depending on silicon quality. I also had people who were typing apostrophes into the address bar - sigh. As for the R5 2600, stock had us at about the performance of the R5 1600 AF stock CPU, while the OC repositioned that to rough equivalence with the R5 1600 AF OC. Thread count equals the CPU thread count. The top gets chopped off these results, but the scaling is similar. The R5 2600 OC placed at roughly the same result as the R5 1600 AF when looking at both sets of overclocked results, and the stock R5 2600 was just ahead of the R5 1600 AF stock result. For budget builders with access to the , there is simply no better choice. We use an internal peer review process where one technician runs tests, then the other reviews the results applying basic logic to ensure everything looks accurate. Image: AMD Bargain hunters may want to take another look at the Ryzen 5 1600. Hitman 2 Dx12 - 1440p At 1440p, the results are mostly the same. MCE is always disabled on test platforms, ensuring that turbo boost durations should be running within specifications set by the CPU manufacturer. The AMD R5 1600 AE retest had it at 77FPS AVG, about the same as the original test from a few months ago, and the overclock put it at 86FPS AVG. The AMD R5 1600 AF had an impressive 226FPS AVG, or a lead of 9. The R5 1600 AF overclock jumped to 240FPS AVG, about 6. AMD is putting the hurt on Intel with parts like this. '" First world problems, Steve. Chaos Group V-Ray CPU Benchmark 1. The upgrade could mean performance and efficiency gains for the chip, which was originally released as a 14 nm part. The R5 1600 AF ends up at 213FPS AVG and 221FPS AVG for the OC 4. That puts the R5 1600 AF as approximately equivalent to an R5 2600 in this title. Unit of measurement: CB Marks higher is better• As expected the margins are very similar at 1440p. Where compatible, we used the following:• The AMD R5 1600 stock CPU, at initial testing, did about 80FPS AVG. Tagged: , , , Search for: Search Recent Posts• 60 GHz CPU Threads: 12 Turbo 6 Cores : 3. Recent Posts• Unit of measurement: MIPS millions of instructions per second; higher is better• Gigabyte X570 Master FC5• We can recommend purchasing the AMD R5 1600 AF. AMD Radeon RX 5700 on• The retest put us to 83FPS AVG, thanks to new BIOS updates and Windows updates, and the R5 1600 AF ran at 92FPS AVG. Next up we have Far Cry New Dawn and yes…. Shopping Shortcuts:• GeForce RTX 2060 Super on. Thus, the 1600 AF which is basically the same CPU for a further discount is just an insane deal. 2 GHz, but based on reports we've seen 4. 2GHz, which scored around 104FPS AVG with the overclock. Here the replacement was the , another part. Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 Puget 18. Did you know that AMD ran out of space on their 14nm line the R5 1600 was originally produced on and so quietly moved it to the 12nm line, making it almost the same as an R5 2600? Blender 2. Forget about the name, this is a 2nd-gen Ryzen part. That is, as long as you can get it. 6 seconds to process each turn. As we said earlier, the Ryzen 5 2600 was already. Some chips might only do 4 GHz depending on silicon quality, some or rather few might exceed 4. A mysterious Ryzen 5 1600 refresh made it to market late last year. Unit of measurement: Render time in minutes lower is better• 79 GN Monkey Heads render CPU-targeted workload with mixed assets, transparencies, and effects. For the decompression test the 2600 was 1. The R5 1600 AF is a weird, weird refresh. The retest for this review brought that up minimally, to 108FPS AVG and with nearly identical lows. OC-vs-OC, the improvement in the 1600 AF is about still about 8. TimeSpy Physics. The shorter the time required, the better. 2 GHz for the base with an all-core boost clock of 3. Our workstation benchmarks include the following tests:• The delta, improving on the AF, is 4. XMP is used on the Corsair memory in our test benches. In other words, the Ryzen 5 1600 AF is not only cheaper than the original 1600 and faster out of the box, but it should also overclock better. Late last year a mysterious Ryzen 5 1600 refresh made it to market. At this point you may be asking yourself, why do I care that AMD is making new products and selling them under old names? 0GHz in almost any circumstance with normal cooling. The clocks are dropped from 3. We like this one because its framerate is so remarkably high under either CPU- or GPU-intensive conditions, and so we get an unmitigated look at performance. You will have to shop carefully and look for a label which matches the one Techspot posted in their review, as well as waiting until you see it selling for close to that price, but if you succeed you will end up with a decent chip for a bargain price. F1 2018 - 1440p F1 at 1440p does have the results chopped a bit, mostly from the spikes that do shoot higher on the GPU in the benchmark. 79 GN Logo render frame from GN intro animation, heavy on ray-tracing. 7-ZIP Decompression benchmark version 1806 x64. Our original R5 1600 chip also does 4 GHz and that seems to be about as good as you can realistically hope for with the older processor. We are also detailing more explicitly the unit of measurement in text, although our charts typically do this as well. But what is this Ryzen 5 1600 AF? Running 7-zip we see identical compression performance. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on• Unit of measurement: Render time in minutes lower is better• Because the more refined process was more efficient, AMD downgraded the cooler to the Wraith Stealth. The AMD R5 1600 AF stock CPU required 40. 7-ZIP Compression benchmark version 1806 x64. 2 GHz seems like the upper end of the overclocking results. For reference, we were never able to get our 1000-series Ryzen CPUs above 4. Frequency Benchmarks We should start with a frequency chart before wasting our time on testing. Since it worked for the 2600, which is the same other than higher stock speeds, it will also work for the R5 1600 in the same way. If the 1600 AF is not selling in your country, you can still buy the R5 2600 for less than any modern Core i5 processor, which is why we had picked it as the you can buy, well, until now. 2GHz reducing that requirement ot 37. TWW2 Battle - 1080p Finally, for the Battle sequence, the R5 1600 AF ran at 138FPS AVG stock, 146FPS AVG overclocked, and the original R5 1600 retested at about 124FPS AVG stock -- the same as previously and within variance -- and 132FPS AVG overclocked, also the same. 4 GHz and cooled using the Wraith Spire. 2GHz scored 125FPS AVG, and for comparison, the AMD R5 2600 stock CPU scored about 116FPS AVG in our original testing from July, although later BIOS releases could have bumped that up marginally. The AMD R5 2600 stock CPU ran at about 137FPS AVG, or 146FPS AVG when overclocked. Civ VI Civilization VI is a turn time benchmark based in seconds rather than frames, allowing us to see AI simulation processing time. Bizarrely, AMD has released a really cheap version of the Ryzen 5 2600, but just called it the Ryzen 5 1600. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on• The CPU seems to be readily available in the United States, but it's not sold everywhere. Our chip -- which we bought from retail -- hit 4. Not much has changed for the 1600 since earlier this year, but it was still worth doing a second time. These are determined by taking thousands of test results per benchmark and determining standard deviation for each individual test and product. The R5 1600 AE, meanwhile, did about 3399MHz to 3699MHz, bouncing between as the threads were switched for the load. Performance in Battlefield V is very similar between the original 1600, the 1600 AF and the 2600. The 1600A basically matching the 2600 making it a little faster than the original, the true 1600. Memory: Memory channels: 2 ECC: Yes PCIe version: 3. that the performance delta is not huge, but the difference in price when compared to the R5 2600 certainly is! Unit of measurement: MIPS millions of instructions per second; higher is better• 20 GHz CPU Cores: 6 Turbo 1 Core : 3. ASUS Crosshair VII Hero X470 Driver version 430. Adaptive sync is not used in testing. Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1080p Shadow of the Tomb Raider with DirectX 12 is next, beginning with 1080p before some of our 1440p results in other games. The results at 1440p are no different and here we see more evidence that the 1600 and 1600 AF will deliver the same gaming experience with a lower tier GPU. The AMD R5 1600 AF scored 85FPS AVG stock, or about 93FPS AVG with the 4. GN CPU Test Bench 2019 Product Courtesy Of CPU This is what we're testing! AMD has begun selling of its 2017-era CPU. 9GHz overclock did score meaningfully better than our original set of tests for the year, up to 120. Bizarrely, AMD released a really cheap version of the Ryzen 5 2600, but just called it the Ryzen 5 1600.。 。 。 。 。 。

>

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF Review

。 。 。 。 。

>

The $85 Ryzen 5 1600 AF; As Cool

。 。 。 。 。 。 。

>

The $85 Ryzen 5 1600 AF; As Cool

。 。 。 。 。 。

>

Ryzen “AF”: AMD Releasing Ryzen 5 1600 CPUs Manufactured under 12 Nm “Zen+” Process

。 。 。 。 。

>

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF CPU Review & Benchmarks: Best CPU Under $100 in 2020

。 。 。 。 。

>

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

。 。 。 。 。

>